MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104845454 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2011.5779403

DOA estimation from temporally and spatially correlated narrowband signals with noncircular sources

2011· article· en· W2104845454 on OpenAlexaff
Sonia Ben Hassen, Faouzi Bellili, Abdelaziz Samet, Sofiène Affes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrowbandSubspace topologyCorrelationVariance (accounting)Signal subspaceAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Estimation theoryExpression (computer science)Computer scienceSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)MathematicsRandom variableSignal processingSpatial correlationCramér–Rao boundStochastic processStatisticsNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop for the first time a method of estimating the DOA parameters assuming noncircular and spatially and temporally correlated signals. The new approach is based on the two-sided IV-SSF method (instrumental variable signal with subspace fitting). It will be shown that our newly developed method outperforms the classical two-sided IV-SSF in terms of lower bias and error variance. Its performance improvement increases as the noncircularity rate increases. Moreover, this improvement is more prominent at low SNR values. We also derive for the first time an analytical expression for the stochastic Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) of the DOA estimates from spatially and temporally correlated signals generated from noncircular sources. The new CRB is compared to that of circular and temporally correlated signals. It will be shown that the CRB obtained assuming both noncircular sources and temporally correlated signals is lower than the CRB derived considering only the temporal correlation. This illustrates the potential gain that both the noncircularity and the temporal correlation provide when considered together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207