Safety Evaluation of Calcium Administered Intranasally to Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calcium, a component of approved human vaccines administered via systemic routes, has a good safety profile. Recently, intranasally administered vaccines containing calcium have shown promise in generating mucosal immune responses in animal models. However, the safety of intranasally administered calcium is unknown. This study evaluates the safety of intranasally administered calcium at 2- to 13-fold higher doses than used in experimental vaccines. At a calcium dose of 22 mg/kg, 80% of the Balb/c and 20% of the C57BL/6 mice die within the first 24 hours. At 11.0 mg/kg, there is no overt toxicity in either strain, based on body weight, clinical scores, blood chemistry, and histopathology of major organs at 7 days post administration. In C57BL/6 mice, apart from acute and subacute inflammation in the lungs at up to 3 days post administration, especially at the 22-mg/kg dose, there is no overt toxicity. Doses of calcium up to 11 mg/kg appear to be safe in a mouse model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".