MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104868801 · doi:10.1086/301400

The Globular Cluster Systems in the Coma Ellipticals. III. The Unique Case of IC 4051

2000· article· en· W2104868801 on OpenAlexaff
Sean C. Woodworth, William E. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobular clusterAstrophysicsPhysicsComa ClusterMetallicityGalaxyLuminosityAstronomyBrightest cluster galaxyElliptical galaxyLuminosity functionHaloGalaxy clusterRADIUSVelocity dispersion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IC 4051 is a giant E galaxy on the outskirts of the Coma Cluster core. Using archival HST WFPC2 data, we derive the metallicity distribution, luminosity function, and spatial structure of its globular cluster system (GCS). The metallicity distribution derived from the V - I colors has a mean ⟨Fe/H⟩ ≃ -0.3, a near-complete lack of metal-poor clusters, and only a small metallicity gradient with radius. We tentatively suggest that the GCS has two roughly equal metallicity subcomponents, one centered at [Fe/H] ∼ 0.0 and the second at [Fe/H] ∼ -1.0, although their identification is blurred by the photometric uncertainties. The luminosity distribution (globular cluster luminosity function) has the standard Gaussian-like form observed in all other giant E galaxies, with a peak (turnover) at V 0 = 27.8, consistent with a Coma distance of 100 Mpc. The radial profiles of both the GCS and the halo light show an unusually steep falloff, which may indicate that the halo of this galaxy has been tidally truncated. Lastly, the specific frequency of the GCS is remarkably large: we find S N = 11 ± 2, at a level that rivals M87 and most others in the central cD-type category, even though IC 4051 is not a cD or brightest cluster elliptical. This galaxy exhibits a combination of GCS characteristics found nowhere else. A formation model consistent with most of the observations would be that this galaxy was subjected to removal of a large fraction of its protogalactic gas shortly after its main phase of globular cluster formation, probably by its first passage through the Coma core. Since then, no significant additions due to accretions or mergers have taken place, in strong contrast to the central Coma galaxy NGC 4874.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207