MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104925482 · doi:10.37236/1495

Restricted permutations, continued fractions, and Chebyshev polynomials

2000· article· en· W2104925482 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsChebyshev polynomialsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $f_n^r(k)$ be the number of 132-avoiding permutations on $n$ letters that contain exactly $r$ occurrences of $12\dots k$, and let $F_r(x;k)$ and $F(x,y;k)$ be the generating functions defined by $F_r(x;k)=\sum_{n\ge 0} f_n^r(k)x^n$ and $F(x,y;k)=\sum_{r\ge 0}F_r(x;k)y^r$. We find an explicit expression for $F(x,y;k)$ in the form of a continued fraction. This allows us to express $F_r(x;k)$ for $1\le r\le k$ via Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it