MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104933308 · doi:10.1109/pes.2008.4596879

MPAC adaptive stability control for power systems with dispersed generations

2008· article· en· W2104933308 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Wang, Richard Cheung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Electric power systemControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl engineeringPower (physics)Generator (circuit theory)Transmission systemControl systemAdaptive controlTransmission (telecommunications)Electronic stability controlEngineeringControl (management)Automotive engineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connection of distributed generations (DGs) on the distribution systems starts to show benefits but may cause serious stability concerns. This paper presents an efficient adaptive stability control, based on step-ahead model prediction methodology, for distribution systems connected with DGs. This control named Model Prediction Adaptive Control (MPAC) is built upon optimization of selected performance index defined as weighted combination of generator voltage deviation, mechanical-electrical torque mismatch, and speed incremental. This paper demonstrates the capability of the MPAC for improvement of the power system stability. This paper offers unique stability study and control of distribution systems subjected to disturbances simultaneously with dynamic operations of DGs, whereas many literatures were focused on the transmission-level power system stability. This paper presents the new concept and design of the MPAC stability control, hardware implementation using state-of-the-art digital signal processing technology, and case studies. Comprehensive illustration of effectiveness of the MPAC versus existing controls is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207