MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104938392 · doi:10.3905/jsf.2000.320213

The Development of the Merchant Power Market in Alberta

2000· article· en· W2104938392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jared Brenner, Isaac Deutsch

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of structured finance · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeregulationBusinessWeb syndicationHydroelectricityPower marketMarket powerPower (physics)Government (linguistics)FinanceMarket economyEconomicsMonopolyEngineeringElectric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first cracks in the traditional monopolies held by Canadian provincial-government-owned hydroelectric companies and large integrated utilities are beginning to emerge. Among the provinces, Alberta is leading the charge towards deregulation of the Canadian power market. In December 1999, the first non-recourse merchant-power project financing to emerge from Canada hit the syndication market. The 416 MW Joffre Cogeneration Plant in the Province Alberta is a model for future merchant power financings in Alberta and across Canada. Despite the significant progress made in deregulation of the Alberta market, the creation of a broad merchant-power market in Canada is still years away. The force that may eventually drive Canada to merchant power is the increased interconnection with the U.S. and greater participation by Canadian utilities in the developing merchant markets to the south.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of structured financeSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207