MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104944718 · doi:10.1501/tarimbil_0000000571

The Late Spring Frost Hardiness of Some Apple Varieties at Various Stages of Flower Buds

2005· article· en· W2104944718 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTarım Bilimleri Dergisi · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardiness (plants)Frost (temperature)Spring (device)BiologyHorticultureBotanyCultivarGeographyEngineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, survival rates of pistils of seven apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) varieties at various stages from tight cluster to full bloom on trees were determined after frost that occurred on the morning at 3:00-8:00 of April 17, 2004 when the temperature dropped to -4 to -6 o C in the orchard. The survival rates of pistils of varieties ranged between 36.7 and 96.5% at tight cluster, 6.2 and 86.0 % at first pink and, 0.2 and 52.0 % at full pink stages after frost injury. 'Starkspur Golden Delicious' (18.0 %), 'Granny Smith' (33.0 %) and 'Canada Reinette' (36.7 %) were the least damaged apple varieties at various flower buds stages from tight cluster to first bloom on trees after frost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTarım Bilimleri DergisiSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207