MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104948049 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2000.851342

On the receive power allocation in a cellular multimedia CDMA system with fixed base station assignment

2002· article· en· W2104948049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCellular networkBase stationCode division multiple accessInterference (communication)Transmitter power outputComputer networkPower controlPower (physics)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the receive power allocation (RPA) problem for multimedia users in a cellular CDMA network. It is shown that the problem can be split into two optimization problems, source-based RPA (SBRPA) and network-based RPA (NBRPA). SBRPA determines the relative receive power levels (RPLs) between different classes of users in each cell irrespective of the intercell interference and it is locally implemented. NBRPA determines the relative RPLs between cells and can be achieved solving an eigenvalue problem with the system-wide class-wise SIR-balancing and it is globally implemented. The need for interference-balancing to increase the capacity with minimum mobile transmit power is emphasized. Finally, numerical results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proper RPA in a cellular multimedia CDMA system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207