MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104955853 · doi:10.1109/tap.2010.2090456

Analysis and Characterization of a Multipole Reconfigurable Transmitarray Element

2010· article· en· W2104955853 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaricapDiodeMultipole expansionCoupling (piping)PIN diodePhase (matter)Reconfigurable antennaFinite element methodCharacterization (materials science)Equivalent circuitMaterials scienceComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringOpticsOptoelectronicsMicrostrip antennaElectrical engineeringAntenna (radio)CapacitancePhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsVoltageAntenna efficiencyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reconfigurable transmitarray element is presented that operates at 5.5 GHz and is low-profile, low-cost and easy to fabricate. The design consists of a three-layer structure implementing two slot-coupled patch antennas. Varactor diodes are used to load the patches and slot to create a third-order resonant structure. A simple circuit-based analysis approach is used to predict the response of the unit cell based on the location of its poles and zeros. Simulation and experimental results are presented, with experimental results achieving 245° of phase agility with less than 3 dB of variation in transmission magnitude throughout the tuning range. The effects of diode loss, angle of incidence, and mutual coupling are investigated. The element is also capable of functioning as a low-loss reconfigurable reflectarray element, making it particularly versatile for different scanning configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it