MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104965543 · doi:10.4138/1975

The New Cornwall syenogranite, Nova Scotia: petrology and geochemistry

2001· article· en· W2104965543 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Georgia Pe‐Piper, Stephen C. Ingram

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsLeucograniteGeologyGeochemistryBatholithNova scotiaPartial meltingPegmatiteFractional crystallization (geology)PaleontologyGneissMetamorphic rockVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The New Cornwall syenogranite is a 1.7 km2 intrusion at the southern margin of the Whale Lake monzogranitc of the South Mountain Batholilh of southwestern Nova Scotia- It has a mean SiO2 content of 75 8%, and contains accessory amounts of tourmaline, andalusite, and primary muscovitc. Ratios such as A/CNK (~ 1.25). Rb/K (~215), and Nb/Ta (- 3.5) show that the syenogranitc is not highly fractionated. Although binary clement plots for some elements show the same regular trend for both monzogranite and syenogranite, variations in trace elements such as Rb, Ha, Th and LREE show that the syenogranite is not derived from the monzogranite by fractional crystalli7ation, as the syenogranite has lower Eu and HREE compared with the monzogranite. Similarities in LREE, Nd isotope composition (ℇNd ~ -2) and other geochemical indicators between monzogranite and syenogranitc suggest that they were derived by partial melting of a common source Both the Whale Lake monzogranite and the New Cornwall syenogranite then evolved independently by fractional crystallization and late fluids played only a minor role in the further evolution of the syenogranitc. This represents a third mode of development of mineralized leucogranite in the South Mountain Batholith, in addition to the previously recognized "associated" and "independent" leucogranitc RÉSUMÉ Le syénogranitc de New Cornwall constituc une intrusion de 1.7 kilomètre carré sur la limite méridionale du granite monzonitique du lac Whale, lequcl fait panic du batholithe du mont South, dans le sud-ouest de la Nouvelle-Écosse. Il a une teneur moyenne en Si02 de 75.8 %, et renferme des quantités accessoires de tourmaline, d'andalousite et de muscovite primaire. Les rapports d'A/CNK (~ 1,25), de Rb/K (~ 215) et de Nb/Ta (~ 3,5) révèlent que le syénogranite n'est pas extrémement fractionné. Même si les représentaions graphiques des éléments binaires de certains éléments révèlent la même tendance régulière dans le cas du granite monzonitique et du syénogranite, les variations des éléments traces comme le Rb, lc Ba, lc Th et les éléments de terres rares légers signalent que le syénogranite ne provient pas du granite monzonitique par cristallisation fractionnairc, car le syénogranite posséde des teneurs moindres en Eu et en éléments de terres rares légerds, la comparativement au granite monzonitique. Les similantés existantes en ce qui conceme les éléments de terres rares légers, la composition en isotopes de Nd (ℇNd ~ -2) et d'autres mdicatcurs gêochimiques entrc le granite monzonitique et le syénogranite permettent de supposer qu'ils proviennent d'une fonte partielle d'une source commune. Le granite monzonitique du lac Whale et le syénogranite de New Cornwall ont ensuite tous deux évolué indépendamment par cristallisation fractionnaire et lcs fluides tardifs ont seulement joué un rôle secondairé dans l'évolution ulténeure du syénogranite. Il s'agit la d'un troisieme mode de développemcnt du leucogranitc minéralisé dans le batholithe du mont South, qui s'ajoute aux leucogranites « assoaés » et « indépendants » dèjà rcconnus Traduit par la rédaction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207