MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104977722 · doi:10.7202/020260ar

La géomorphologie glaciaire de la région du mont Tremblant. Deuxième partie : La région de Saint-Faustin – Saint-Jovite

2005· article· en· W2104977722 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Camille Laverdière, Albert Courtemanche

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyVarveGlacierGlacial periodGeomorphologyMoraineArchaeologyPhysical geographyGeographySediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glacial tongues, reaching down from the north by way of the valleys on both sides of Mont Tremblant, have spread out in coalescent-lobes in the St. Faustin - St. Jovite bowl and have built up two terminal moraines at Sommet. On and around the site of the Provincial Fish Hatchery at St. Faustin, at least five ice-dammed lakes have been formed between the face of the receding glacier and the natural slope of the ground. The formation of other ice-dammed lakes preceded the establishment of the Rivière Boulé (which had its mouth first at Morrison, then at David sawmill, before settling into its present bed) while the glacial tongue was receding, by phases, from the valley of the Ruisseau des Français. The intermount glacier then caused the retention of two large areas of lake water, in which the plain of St. Jovite was formed before these waters receded as far as Lac à l’Équerre, where the melting of the ice provided a relief of fluvioglacial deposits. Finally, the Champlain Sea was able to stretch out a long arm though the valley of the Rivière Rouge and flood the lower valley of the Rivière du Diable where varved clay and sand have been deposited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de géographie du QuébecSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207