MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2104998497 · doi:10.3386/w13826

Evidence From Maternity Leave Expansions of the Impact of Maternal Care on Early Child Development

2008· report· en· W2104998497 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael Baker, Kevin Milligan

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2008
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of California, DavisMcMaster University
KeywordsMaternity leaveMaternity careChild careDemographic economicsPsychologyMedicineEconomicsNursingEconomic growthHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the impact of maternal care on early child development using an expansion in Canadian maternity leave entitlements.Following the leave expansion, mothers who took leave spent between 48 and 58 percent more time not working in the first year of their children's lives.We find that this extra maternal care primarily crowded out home-based care by unlicensed non-relatives, and replaced mostly full-time work.However, the estimates suggest a weak impact of the increase in maternal care on indicators of child development.Measures of family environment and motor-social development showed changes very close to zero.Some improvements in temperament were observed but occurred both for treated and untreated children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.343
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207