MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105030593 · doi:10.1002/anie.201506131

Understanding P450‐mediated Bio‐transformations into Epoxide and Phenolic Metabolites

2015· article· en· W2105030593 on OpenAlexafffund
Anna Tomberg, Joshua Pottel, Zhaomin Liu, Paul Labute, Nicolas Moitessier

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCytochrome P450ChemistryEnzymeDrug metabolismDrugToxicityEpoxideMetabolismBiotransformationBiochemistryHydroxylationReactive intermediateMoleculePhenolsStereochemistryPharmacologyOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse drug reactions are commonly the result of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) converting the drugs into reactive metabolites. Thus, information about the CYP bioactivation of drugs would not only provide insight into metabolic stability, but also into the potential toxicity. For example, oxidation of phenyl rings may lead to either toxic epoxides or safer phenols. Herein, we demonstrate that the potential to form reactive metabolites is encoded primarily in the properties of the molecule to be oxidized. While the enzyme positions the molecule inside the binding pocket (selects the site of metabolism), the subsequent reaction is only dependent on the substrate itself. To test this hypothesis, we used this observation as a predictor of drug inherent toxicity. This approach was used to successfully identify the formation of reactive metabolites in over 100 drug molecules. These results provide a new perspective on the impact of functional groups on aromatic oxidation of drugs and their effects on toxicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207