MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105083462 · doi:10.1109/jmems.2009.2016287

Thermoelastic Damping in Hollow and Slotted Microresonators

2009· article· en· W2105083462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoelastic dampingClassification of discontinuitiesResonatorThermal conductionChannel (broadcasting)PiecewisePhysicsMathematical analysisAcousticsMechanicsTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceThermalMathematicsOpticsEngineeringThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microresonators employed in microelectromechanical systems for sensing and communications are growing increasingly more sophisticated in terms of structural geometry and mode shapes. Accompanying this increase in sophistication is a corresponding need to develop accurate analytical models to predict the dynamic properties of such resonators. Here, we present an analytical framework to compute thermoelastic damping (TED) in the general class of microresonators characterized by structural discontinuities in the form of slots or internal channels. The temperature field within the resonators is obtained by solving the one-way coupled equation of thermoelastic heat conduction in a piecewise fashion, thereby capturing the effects of structural discontinuities interrupting heat conduction within the beam. The framework is validated by comparison with previously reported finite-element analysis and measurements of damping in slotted microresonators. The analysis leads to an expression for TED in the form of rapidly converging infinite series, and accurate closed-form expressions are obtained by retaining the leading terms. These simple formulas enable a rapid exploration of the design space over a full range of parameters, as illustrated for the case of hollow single-crystal-silicon beams containing internal channels. For constant channel volume, the peak value of TED reduces monotonically with the ratio of channel width to channel height. The analysis is used to identify designs that reduce TED to values that are less than 2 times 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-5</sup> at all frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it