MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105094167 · doi:10.1029/2009jb006375

A multiscale model of partial melts: 1. Effective equations

2010· article· en· W2105094167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogenization (climate)InterphaseMechanicsCompressibilityRelative permeabilityMaterials scienceMicrostructurePermeability (electromagnetism)Macroscopic scaleConstitutive equationMicroscopic scaleStatistical physicsThermodynamicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsFinite element methodChemistryComposite materialPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing accurate and tractable mathematical models for partially molten systems is critical for understanding the dynamics of magmatic plate boundaries as well as the geochemical evolution of the planet. Because these systems include interacting fluid and solid phases, developing such models can be challenging. The composite material of melt and solid may have emergent properties, such as permeability and compressibility that are absent in each phase alone. Previous work by several authors have used multiphase flow theory to derive macroscopic equations based on conservation principles and assumptions about interphase forces and interactions. Here we present a complementary approach using homogenization, a multiple scale theory. Our point of departure is a model of the microstructure, assumed to possess an arbitrary, but periodic, microscopic geometry of interpenetrating melt and matrix. At this scale, incompressible Stokes flow is assumed to govern both phases, with appropriate interface conditions. Homogenization systematically leads to macroscopic equations for the melt and matrix velocities, as well as the bulk parameters, permeability and bulk viscosity, without requiring ad hoc closures for interphase forces. We show that homogenization can lead to a range of macroscopic models depending on the relative contrast in melt and solid properties such as viscosity or velocity. In particular, we identify a regime that is in good agreement with previous formulations, without including their attendant assumptions. Thus, this work serves as independent verification of these models. In addition, homogenization provides a consistent machinery for computing consistent macroscopic constitutive relations such as permeability and bulk viscosity that are consistent with a given microstructure. These relations are explored numerically in the companion paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it