MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105113657 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2010.5700359

Memory requirements for future Internet routers with essentially-perfect QoS guarantees

2010· article· en· W2105113657 on OpenAlexaff
Ted H. Szymanski, Bell Canada Chair

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkQuality of serviceComputer scienceRouterNetwork packetMultiprotocol Label SwitchingCore routerScheduling (production processes)Token bucketInternet trafficThe InternetEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theory of a future Internet network which achieves essentially-perfect QoS guarantees for all QoS-enabled traffic flows for all loads ≤ 100% of capacity has recently been established. A scheduling algorithm with a bounded normalized service lead/lag (NSLL) is used to schedule traffic flows within the routers. An 'Application-Specific Token-Buffer Traffic Shaper' is used at the traffic sources, to achieve a bounded NSLL on incoming bursty traffic flows. An 'Application-Specific Playback Queue' is used to perfectly regenerate the original busty traffic flows at every destination. Under these conditions, it has been established that every QoS-enabled flow: (i) is delivered with essentially-perfect end-to-end QoS guarantees, and (ii) buffers O(K) cells/packets per router, where K is the bound on the NSLL. In this paper, we reduce the router buffering requirements significantly, so that each router buffers ≤ one cell/packet per QoS-enabled traffic flow, a reduction of up to 1K-10K over existing technologies. The proposed technology can be incorporated into new routers with negligible hardware cost, and is compatible with existing IntServ, DiffServ, MPLS and RSVP-TE protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207