MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105125262 · doi:10.4095/214206

Central Baffin Electromagnetic Experiment (CBEX), Phase 2

2003· report· en· W2105125262 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shane Evans, Alan G. Jones, J. Spratt, John Katsube

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase (matter)GeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a part of the Central Baffin Multidisciplinary Project (a collaborative effort of theGeological Survey of Canada, The Canada-Nunuvut Geoscience Centre, and the Polar Continental Shelf Project), a 45 station, 500 km long regional-scale magnetotelluric profile was acquired. The profile crosses the northern margin of the Trans-Hudson Orogen and extends northward into the Archean Rae Craton. To the south, the profile crosses the Paleoproterozoic Piling Group. The primary goal of the experiment was to determine major geological boundaries by delineating regional electrical structures. Preliminary analysis shows that the conductive Astarte River Formation can be mapped and used as a proxy for the base of the Piling Group. Analysis has also revealed a high conductivity contrast between the Piling Group metasedimentary rocks and the northern Archean granite and gneissic complexes. Laboratory results indicate that the conductivity in the Astarte River Formation is due to the high content of interconnected graphite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207