MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105140856 · doi:10.1144/sp369.19

A tectonic model for hyperextension at magma-poor rifted margins: an example from the West Iberia–Newfoundland conjugate margins

2012· article· en· W2105140856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marta Pérez‐Gussinyé

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMagmaPaleontologyVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hyperextended, magma-poor margins are characterized by a wide continent–ocean transition and anomalously small fractions of magmatism during mantle exhumation prior to oceanic spreading. Here, I bring together several aspects of their rift to drift transition and give a coherent picture of their evolution from platform to deep-sea environments. I focus mainly on the West Iberia Margin (WIM)–Newfoundland (NF) conjugates in the North Atlantic Ocean. The architectural evolution of these margins is characterized by upper-crustal faulting and lower-crustal deformation that are tightly coupled, resulting in fault displacement that is accompanied by underlying, equal and coeval crustal thinning. Lower crust deforms first ductilely, but then progressively switches to brittle due to enhanced conductive cooling at very slow extension velocities (< c. 6 mm a −1 half-rate). The switch from ductile to progressively brittle lower crust is accompanied by the emergence of a dominant basinwards fault dip and oceanwards younging of fault activity. It is shown that these processes, acting in concert: (1) reconcile the horizontal extension on faults with crustal thinning without the need of lower-crustal flow; (2) explain, within one common Andersonian framework (faults active at 65°–30°), the change in fault geometry from planar to listric to detachment-like with increasing extension; and (3) generate the tectonic asymmetry observed between conjugate pairs. This work also discusses a high-resolution seismic section of the WIM showing that the ‘detachment-like’ fault S is truncated prior to the peridotite ridge where mantle exhumation first takes place. This suggests that serpentinized mantle rises due to its own buoyancy, separating and pulling the thinned crustal blocks apart. Once the crust has been separated, further mantle exhumation takes place by magma-poor extension of the underlying mantle. I show with numerical models that either a small reduction of mantle potential temperature ( c. 25–50 °C), a mantle depletion of more than 10% or very slow half-extension velocities ( c. 6 mm a −1 ) are required to reproduce the small amount of magmatism inferred. Available observations support either a very slow extension velocity or a smaller than normal mantle temperature; however, estimation errors may be large. Ultimately, unravelling which of these factors most contribute to magma-poor mantle exhumation will provide an improved understanding of the mantle lateral homogeneity and the three-dimensional nature of the rifting to drifting process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207