MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105163139 · doi:10.1049/iet-map:20070227

Reducing computational costs using a multi-region finite element method for electromagnetic scattering

2008· article· en· W2105163139 on OpenAlexaff
P. Paul, J.P. Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodScatteringBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemDomain (mathematical analysis)Set (abstract data type)Computational electromagneticsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceAlgorithmSpace (punctuation)MathematicsMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsComputational sciencePhysicsElectromagnetic fieldOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electromagnetic scattering problems involving multiple scatterers can be solved by the finite element method using a single domain truncated with an absorbing boundary condition, but often it is more efficient to separate the single domain into several subdomains, separated by free-space, and to solve the set of subdomains iteratively. This multi-region method has been reported in the literature. Its relative computational cost is investigated and formulas for determining are provided when it is advantageous to use a multi-region against a single-region method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207