Novel molecular device based on electrostatic interactions in organic polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of researchers have reported attempts to design molecular level devices. One approach is to make use of electrostatic interactions in different parts of a polymeric molecule. This paper reports a means to achieve this by adding space charge to a molecule consisting of symmetric and asymmetric subgroups. Physically, space charge residing in a subgroup produces a dipolar charge layer thereby creating a potential trough in the polymer backbone. By lifting or lowering this potential minimum, it is possible to modify the terminal current. The effect of space charge on the potential profile in the polymer backbone was examined and the change correlated to data on carrier mobilities for OC1C10-PPV reported in the literature. Modulation of space charge in the subgroup allows the manipulation of current flow along the polymer backbone, forming the basis for the development of a molecular device. A first-order analysis suggested that such a device could have current-voltage (I-V) characteristics similar to those of a MOSFET at subthreshold, with an estimated transconductance approximately 1-2 pAV and a cutoff frequency approximately 10(15) Hz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".