MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105232489 · doi:10.1109/tadvp.2007.907903

An Analytical Elasto-Creep Model of Solder Joints in Leadless Chip Resistors: Part 1—Development and Verification

2007· article· en· W2105232489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepSolderingFinite element methodResistorDiscretizationMaterials scienceStress relaxationStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringMechanicsComposite materialEngineeringMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel two-dimensional model is presented for multiaxial thermal stresses, elastic strains, creep strains, and creep energy density at the interfaces of solder joints in leadless chip resistor (LCR) assemblies. The model is applicable to both plane stress and plane strain conditions, and incorporates both global and local expansivity mismatches. Interfacial thermal stresses are approximated using elementary strength of materials theory under arbitrary time-dependent thermal loading. Partial differential equations are linearized through a simple finite difference discretization procedure. The model is mathematically straightforward, and can be extended to include plastic behavior and problems involving external loads and a variety of geometries. The paper presents comparisons with finite element results and considers the mechanics of solder creep accumulation and stress relaxation as predicted by the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it