MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105238849 · doi:10.7202/1029014ar

La gestion des bénévoles dans les organismes à but non lucratif : une approche différenciée

2015· article· fr· W2105238849 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jacob Atangana-Abé

Bibliographic record

VenueÉconomie et solidarités · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les bénévoles sont reconnus comme étant une composante essentielle des organismes à but non lucratif (OBNL). Plusieurs auteurs s’accordent par ailleurs à reconnaître qu’ils constituent l’un des traits caractéristiques des organisations du tiers secteur (Keyton, Wilson et Geiger, 1990; Wymer, 2003; Brudney, 2005; McCurley, 2005). Parallèlement à son importance sur le plan organisationnel, le recours aux bénévoles s’affirme comme une tendance lourde de l’économie nationale (Statistique Canada, 2012). À partir des résultats d’une recherche empirique, cet article propose une typologie originale des bénévoles qui implique, en ce qui concerne ces derniers, une approche de gestion différenciée qui tient compte des attentes et des motivations spécifiques de chaque catégorie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉconomie et solidaritésSame topicNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringFrench-language works237,207