MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105256465 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2009.2031605

Parallel and Scalable Transient Simulator for Power Grids via Waveform Relaxation (PTS-PWR)

2009· article· en· W2105256465 on OpenAlexaff
Ramachandra Achar, M. Nakhla, Harjot Dhindsa, Arvind Sridhar, D. Paul, Natalie Nakhla

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformParallelizable manifoldTransient (computer programming)Convergence (economics)ScalabilityComputer scienceComputational scienceRelaxation (psychology)GridPower system simulationParallel computingVery-large-scale integrationPower (physics)Electronic engineeringSimulationAlgorithmElectric power systemEngineeringEmbedded systemMathematicsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a fast algorithm for transient simulation of power grids in very large scale integration systems using waveform relaxation (WR) techniques. Novel partitioning methods and convergence accelerators are developed for fast convergence of WR iterations when applied to power grid networks. Unlike the direct solvers, the new method is highly parallelizable and scales well with the increasing number of CPUs, leading to significant speed-ups. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the validity and efficiency of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207