MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105312435 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2011.6032893

Improving the design of relay nodes for cooperative opportunistic beamforming

2011· article· en· W2105312435 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey G. Messier, Jean‐François Bousquet, Sebastian Magierowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayBeamformingComputer scienceFadingRelay channelNode (physics)Scheduling (production processes)Electronic engineeringCooperative diversityChannel (broadcasting)Computer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative opportunistic beamforming (CoopOBF) uses a relay node to augment channel fading in order to improve the multi-user diversity achieved using opportunistic scheduling. This paper discusses a very simple, all analog CoopOBF relay prototype capable of reflecting and amplifying the source node signal while, at the same time, imposing an arbitrary phase shift on that signal. Performance measurements collected from the prototype will be used in simulation to evaluate CoopOBF performance. These simulations will also be used to illustrate how best to improve the current relay hardware design in order to maximize the capacity improvement achieved when using CoopOBF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207