A recursive technique for computing lower-bound performance of schedules
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presents a fast recursive technique for estimating a lower-bound performance of data path schedules. The method relies on the determination of an ASAPUC (as soon as possible under constraint) time-step value for the root of the DFG (data flow graph) that is based on the ASAPUC values of its predecessor nodes, etc., until the leaf nodes are reached where this value becomes the regular ASAP value. The method computes a tighter lower-bound than the greedy technique and is only two times slower on the same benchmarks. Synthesis methods that depend on the exploration of the solution space directed by a lower-bound estimation, such a local microcode generation and behavioral synthesis, can benefit from our method. This is because bad solutions can be pruned earlier. We illustrate this dramatic effect on the reduction of the search space during the synthesis of an optimal microcode sequence for the elliptic wave filter benchmark and a fixed data path (containing a multiport RAM and a ROM).< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it