Western Grenville Province holds key to midcontinental Granite‐Rhyolite Province enigma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Mesoproterozoic Granite‐Rhyolite Provinces in North America consist of A‐type granitic and rhyolitic rocks, and their formation is commonly ascribed to continental `extension' or `rifting'. The tectonic environment of the extension is, however, poorly understood. New Sm–Nd isotopic data from the Central Gneiss Belt, Grenville Province, Ontario, suggest that rocks compositionally and temporally similar to those in the Granite‐Rhyolite Provinces formed in and behind an active continental arc undergoing intra‐arc and back‐arc extension. Basaltic underplating accompanied extension, providing heat and juvenile material. Source rocks vary from juvenile within the arc, to more mature with increasing distance behind the arc. Recent investigations from SW Baltica show that the Rjukan Group, a proposed Granite‐Rhyolite Province correlative, also formed inboard of an active continental arc. A tectonically and temporally similar, and probably recurrent, evolution along the vast Laurentia–Baltica margin points to active continental‐margin processes as first‐order controls on back‐arc granite‐rhyolite magmatism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".