MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105426660 · doi:10.1109/icccyb.2010.5491332

A reconfigurable architecture for IP Multimedia Subsystem session setup

2010· article· en· W2105426660 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond Peterkin, Fadi El-Hassan, Dan Ionescu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSession Initiation ProtocolSession (web analytics)IP Multimedia SubsystemApplication-specific integrated circuitEmbedded systemServerComputer networkSystem on a chipProtocol (science)Computer architectureArchitectureMultimediaQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The architecture of IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) enables converged voice, video, and data services and contains mechanisms related to session and connection control. Numerous protocols are used to perform IMS operations however the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) plays a central role in the functionality of IMS. With increased demand for multimedia communications functionality, a software implementation of IMS limits performance and increases power consumption when controlling applications through devices like gateways, proxies and application servers. Therefore a strong desire exists to implement SIP using low power consumption hardware platforms very fast time responses. The large integration scale of the present chip technology allows for implementing all SIP mechanisms and interfaces in a single integrated chip or ASIC. In this paper, a reconfigurable hardware implementation of the session setup of IMS is described based on a hardware implementation of SIP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207