MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105435678 · doi:10.1007/s11832-011-0341-7

Fassier–Duval femoral rodding in children with osteogenesis imperfecta receiving bisphosphonates: Functional outcomes at one year

2011· article· en· W2105435678 on OpenAlex
Joanne Ruck, Noémi Dahan‐Oliel, Kathleen Montpetit, Frank Rauch, François Fassier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Children s Orthopaedics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalShriners Hospitals for Children - Canada
FundersShriners Hospitals for Children
KeywordsOsteogenesis imperfectaMedicineFemurSurgeryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To examine the functional outcomes of children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) following initial Fassier-Duval (FD) rodding to the femur at 1 year, and to determine which factors are associated with change in gross motor function, ambulation, and functional performance. METHODS: Approval from our Institutional Review Board was obtained. A retrospective chart review identified 60 children (28 males, 32 females) with OI who underwent initial FD femoral rodding (101 rods) and who were receiving bisphosphonates. The mean age of the children was 3 years, 11 months at the initial femoral FD rodding. Two had type I OI, 30 type III, 27 type IV, and one type VI. The maximum length of follow-up was 4 years. Telescoping FD rods were used for the femurs, with surgeries performed one leg at a time, with a 1-week interval. The active range of motion (AROM) of the hips and knees in flexion was measured 4-5 weeks post-initial rodding. Outcomes on the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) Ambulation Scale, the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) were compared pre-operatively and at 1 year post-surgery using t-tests and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, the mean FAQ score was 2.0, and this increased to 5.8 at 1 year post-surgery. Statistically significant improvements (P ≤ 0.05) were found on the FAQ, crawling, standing, walking and running, and total domains of the GMFM, and PEDI mobility and self-care from baseline to 1 year. The results from the multivariate linear regression indicate that older age (P = 0.0045) and higher weight (P = 0.0164) are significantly associated with lower scores in the self-care domain of the PEDI, and that OI type III compared to type IV is significantly associated (P = 0.0457) with greater improvement on the crawling domain of the GMFM. Higher weight was also associated (P = 0.0289) with lower scores in the standing domain of the GMFM, as well as with the total GMFM score (P = 0.0398). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that initial FD femoral rodding resulted in benefits in ambulation, gross motor function, self-care, and mobility for children with OI beyond physiological expectations due to developmental growth. FD rodding is a procedure which can improve the overall mobility in children with OI with significant femoral deformities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it