Photoelectrochemical studies on poly[1-(2-aminophenyl)pyrrole] — Creation of a photoactive inorganic–organic semiconductor interface (IOI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The compound 2-APPy [1-(2-aminophenyl)pyrrole] as an organic phase in an inorganic–organic semiconductor interface (IOI) assembly was the subject of photoelectrochemical studies in aqueous solutions. Results show that thin films of poly(2-APPy) can be prepared using oxidative electropolymerization. Furthermore, absorption spectroscopic studies indicate that the protonated 2-APPy polymer’s ionization potential (IP) is 4.7 eV, the electron affinity (EA) is 1.90 eV, and a gap of 2.80 eV separates the higher occupied molecular orbital’s (HOMO) and lower unoccupied molecular orbital’s (LUMO) energy levels of this polymer. Impedance measurements under illumination show an increase in the film charge capacitance compared with those measured under darkened conditions. The behavior of the poly(2-APPy) film as a host for redox-active dopants was also explored. The results show that the film did not alter the redox potentials of a large dopant such as PMo 12 O 40 3– . The photoactivities of the IOI assemblies consisting of 2-APPy and nanoparticles of ZnO, and of Fe 2 O 3 were investigated using fluorescence emissions. Results show that the fluorescence emissions generated by 2-APPy were quenched by 5% and 55% on ZnO and on Fe 2 O 3 , respectively. The charge injection rate constants, k ct , at the inorganic metal oxide–2-APPy interface, were calculated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".