MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105476049 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2010.2043152

A Widely Linear Distortionless Filter for Single-Channel Noise Reduction

2010· article· en· W2105476049 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob Benesty, Jindong Chen, Yiteng Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise reductionDistortion (music)Filter (signal processing)Computer scienceSpeech recognitionNoise (video)Reduction (mathematics)Noise measurementSpeech enhancementSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)AlgorithmShort-time Fourier transformMathematicsFourier transformArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsFourier analysisAmplifierComputer visionBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditionally in the single-channel noise-reduction problem, speech distortion is inevitable since the desired signal is also filtered while filtering the noise. In fact, the more the noise is reduced, the more the speech distortion is added into the desired signal, as proved in the literature. So, if we require no speech distortion, we either end up with no noise reduction at all or have to use multiple sensors. In this paper, we attempt to apply the widely linear (WL) estimation theory to noise reduction. Unlike the traditional approaches that only filter the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) of the noisy signal, the method developed in this paper applies the noise-reduction filter to both the STFT of the noisy signal and its conjugate. With the constraint of no speech distortion, a WL distortionless filter is derived. We show that this new optimal filter can fully take advantage of the noncircularity property of speech signals to achieve up to 3-dB signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) improvement without introducing any speech distortion, which can only be obtained with the traditional approaches if two or more microphones are used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207