← Back to cohort
Pion emission from the T2K replica target: Method, results and application
N. Abgrall, A. Aduszkiewicz, T. Anticic, N. G. Antoniou, J. Argyriades, B. Baatar, A. Blondel, J. Blümer, M. Bogomilov, A. Bravar, W. K. Brooks, J. Brzychczyk, A. Bubak, S.A. Bunyatov, O. Busygina, P. Christakoglou, P. Chung, T. Czopowicz, N. Davis, S. Débieux, S. Di Luise, W. Dominik, J. Dumarchez, K. Dynowski, R. Engel, A. Ereditato, L. S. Esposito, Г. Феофилов, Z. Fodor, A. Ferrero, Ágnes Fülöp, M. Gaździcki, M. Golubeva, B. Grabez, K. Grebieszkow, A. Grzeszczuk, F. Guber, A. Haesler, H. Hakobyan, T. Hasegawa, R. Idczak, S. Igolkin, Y. Ivanov, A. Ivashkin, K. Kadija, A. S. Kapoyannis, N. Katryńska, D. Kiełczewska, D. P. Kikoła, M. Kirejczyk, J. Kisiel, T. Kiss, S. Kleinfelder, T. Kobayashi, O. Kochebina, V.I. Kolesnikov, D. Kolev, V. Kondratiev, A. Korzenev, S. Kowalski, A. Krasnoperov, S. Kuleshov, A. Kurepin, R. Lacey, D. Larsen, Á. László, V.V. Lyubushkin, M. Maćkowiak-Pawłowska, Z. Majka, B. Maksiak, A.I. Malakhov, D. Maletić, A. Marchionni, A. Marcinek, Ioana Codrina Mariş, V. Marin, K. Márton, T. Matulewicz, V. Matveev, G. L. Melkumov, M. Messina, Stanisław Mrówczyński, S. Murphy, T. Nakadaira, K. Nishikawa, T. Palczewski, G. Pálla, A.D. Panagiotou, T. Paul, W. Peryt, O. Petukhov, R. Płaneta, J. Pluta, B. Popov, M. Posiadała, S. Puławski, J. Puzović, Wolfgang Rauch, M. Ravonel, R. Renfordt, A. Robert, D. Röhrich, E. Rondio, B. Rossi, M. Roth, A. Rubbia, A. Rustamov, M. Rybczyński, A. Sadovsky, K. Sakashita, Mihailo Savić, T. Sekiguchi, P. Seyboth, M. Shibata, M. Sipos, E. Skrzypczak, M. Słodkowski, P. Staszel, G. Stefanek, J. Steṕaniak, C. Strabel, H. Ströbele, T. Susa, M. Szuba, M. Tada, A. Taranenko, В. Терещенко, T. Tolyhi, R. Tsenov, L. Turko, R. Ulrich, M. Unger, M. Vassiliou, Darko Veberič, V. Vechernin, G. Vesztergombi, A. Wilczek, Z. Włodarczyk, A. Wojtaszek-Szwarć, O. Wyszyński, L. Zambelli, W. Zipper, V. Galymov, M. Hartz, A. K. Ichikawa, H. Kubo, A. D. Marino, D. Matvienko, A. Murakami, T. Nakaya, K. Suzuki, T. Yuan, E. D. Zimmerman
Bibliographic record
VenueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesHungarian Scientific Research FundMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte
KeywordsPhysicsNeutrinoNuclear physicsNeutrino oscillationLarge Hadron ColliderFlux (metallurgy)Particle physicsHadronPionProtonSolar neutrino problemSolar neutrino
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations41
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno