MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105518727 · doi:10.1521/jsyt.2014.33.2.50

The Statement of Us: A Narrative-Based Practice for Enhancing Couples' Preferred Identity

2014· article· en· W2105518727 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Beckenbach, Shawn Patrick, James N. Sells, Lisa Terrazas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systemic Therapies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExternalizationStatement (logic)NarrativeIdentity (music)PsychologySocial psychologyNarrative therapyEpistemologyAestheticsLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Statement of Us is a narrative-based practice that assists couples in establishing and enhancing their relationship identity. Initially through externalization of the relationship, couples are able to examine their preferred relationship as opposed to a problematic relationship. The Statement of Us practice provides a format for introducing this externalization in a way that emphasizes the couple's strengths, intentions, and identity. The practice also results in a documenting of their preferred relationship identity. We describe the practice as well as offer statements from couples who found the process to be beneficial to their relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systemic TherapiesSame topicAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFrench-language works237,207