MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Codimensions of polynomial identities of representations of Lie algebras

2013· preprint· lv· W2105537249 on OpenAlexafffund
А. С. Гордиенко

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2013
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsMathematicsPolynomialLie algebraConjecturePure mathematicsRepresentation (politics)Algebra over a fieldVector spaceSpace (punctuation)Representation theoryComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a representation <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="rho colon upper L right-arrow German g German l left-parenthesis upper V right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> ρ </mml:mi> <mml:mo> : </mml:mo> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false"> → </mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">l</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\rho \colon L \to \mathfrak {gl}(V)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> where <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper L"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">L</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a Lie algebra and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper V"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">V</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is a finite dimensional vector space. We prove the analog of Amitsur’s conjecture on asymptotic behavior for codimensions of polynomial identities of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="rho"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> ρ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\rho</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207