MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Codimensions of polynomial identities of representations of Lie algebras

2013· preprint· lv· W2105537249 on OpenAlexafffund
А. С. Гордиенко

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2013
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsMathematicsPolynomialLie algebraConjecturePure mathematicsRepresentation (politics)Algebra over a fieldVector spaceSpace (punctuation)Representation theoryComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a representation ρ : L → g l ( V ) \rho \colon L \to \mathfrak {gl}(V) where L L is a Lie algebra and V V is a finite dimensional vector space. We prove the analog of Amitsur’s conjecture on asymptotic behavior for codimensions of polynomial identities of ρ \rho .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207