Indigestible Stew and Holy Piss: The Politics of Food in Rodolphe Girard's Marie Calumet.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis sa publication en 1904, Marie Calumet de Rodolphe Girard a suscite de nombreuses polemiques a cause de l'anticlericalisme du roman et l'audace d'un auteur qui osait parler du corps et du desir sexuel. Pour la premiere fois dans une litterature qui avait comme but de depeindre une belle societe rurale et catholique, Girard offre dans son roman une vision de l'humanite qui est bestiale, gouvernee plus par ses pulsions corporelles que par la spiritualite et la piete. Cet article se propose d'analyser le role de la nourriture dans ce roman. En etudiant des scenes de preparation, de consommation et d'elimination, nous pouvons mieux comprendre la hardiesse d'un auteur qui faisait une parodie du roman de la terre. Cependant, měme dans un roman juge comme outrageant, il y reside un sentiment de honte et de peur qui reflete une societe repressive qui ne permet pas a ses artistes de s'exprimer librement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".