MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105567257 · doi:10.5194/acp-14-6345-2014

Overview of the Manitou Experimental Forest Observatory: site description and selected science results from 2008 to 2013

2014· article· en· W2105567257 on OpenAlexaff
John Ortega, A. Turnipseed, Alex Guenther, Thomas Karl, Douglas A. Day, David Gochis, J. A. Huffman, A. J. Prenni, Ezra J. T. Levin, Sonia M. Kreidenweis, Paul J. DeMott, Yutaka Tobo, Edward G. Patton, Alma Hodžić, Y. Y. Cui, P. C. Harley, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Eric C. Apel, Russell K. Monson, Allyson S. D. Eller, J. Greenberg, M. C. Barth, Pedro Campuzano‐Jost, Brett B. Palm, J. L. Jiménez, A. C. Aiken, Manvendra K. Dubey, Chris Geron, John H. Offenberg, Michael G. Ryan, Paula J. Fornwalt, S. C. Pryor, Frank N. Keutsch, Joshua P. DiGangi, Arthur W. H. Chan, Allen H. Goldstein, Glenn M. Wolfe, L. Kaser, R. Schnitzhofer, Armin Hansel, C. A. Cantrell, Roy L. Mauldin, James N. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSeventh Framework ProgrammeU.S. Forest ServiceMax-Planck-Institut für ChemieUniversität InnsbruckOffice of Research and DevelopmentColorado State UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonLos Alamos National LaboratoryNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchAustrian Science FundU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMax-Planck-GesellschaftUniversity of DenverU.S. Department of EnergyU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceTrace gasAerosolEddy covarianceAtmospheric sciencesAtmospheric chemistryEarth scienceHydrology (agriculture)EcosystemMeteorologyGeologyGeographyEcologyOzone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Bio-hydro-atmosphere interactions of Energy, Aerosols, Carbon, H2O, Organics & Nitrogen (BEACHON) project seeks to understand the feedbacks and inter-relationships between hydrology, biogenic emissions, carbon assimilation, aerosol properties, clouds and associated feedbacks within water-limited ecosystems. The Manitou Experimental Forest Observatory (MEFO) was established in 2008 by the National Center for Atmospheric Research to address many of the BEACHON research objectives, and it now provides a fixed field site with significant infrastructure. MEFO is a mountainous, semi-arid ponderosa pine-dominated forest site that is normally dominated by clean continental air but is periodically influenced by anthropogenic sources from Colorado Front Range cities. This article summarizes the past and ongoing research activities at the site, and highlights some of the significant findings that have resulted from these measurements. These activities include - soil property measurements; - hydrological studies; - measurements of high-frequency turbulence parameters; - eddy covariance flux measurements of water, energy, aerosols and carbon dioxide through the canopy; - determination of biogenic and anthropogenic volatile organic compound emissions and their influence on regional atmospheric chemistry; - aerosol number and mass distributions; - chemical speciation of aerosol particles; - characterization of ice and cloud condensation nuclei; - trace gas measurements; and - model simulations using coupled chemistry and meteorology. In addition to various long-term continuous measurements, three focused measurement campaigns with state-of-the-art instrumentation have taken place since the site was established, and two of these studies are the subjects of this special issue: BEACHON-ROCS (Rocky Mountain Organic Carbon Study, 2010) and BEACHON-RoMBAS (Rocky Mountain Biogenic Aerosol Study, 2011).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physicsSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207