MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105599307 · doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.18.4.399

The Field Description of Igneous Rocks, Second Edition

2012· article· en· W2105599307 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dougal A. Jerram, Nick Petford

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental and Engineering Geoscience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationGeologistIconField (mathematics)PrecambrianSection (typography)Library scienceGeologyGeological surveyArchaeologyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceHistoryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| November 01, 2012 The Field Description of Igneous Rocks, Second Edition Dougal Jerram; Dougal Jerram Precambrian Geoscience Section, Ontario Geological Survey, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Nick Petford Nick Petford Precambrian Geoscience Section, Ontario Geological Survey, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2012) 18 (4): 399–400. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.18.4.399 Article history first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Dougal Jerram, Nick Petford; The Field Description of Igneous Rocks, Second Edition. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 2012;; 18 (4): 399–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.18.4.399 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEnvironmental & Engineering Geoscience Search Advanced Search Review by: R. M. Easton As a mapping geologist, the question of which reference books to take into the field is ongoing, especially if one is working with student field assistants. One is looking for books that are compact, well illustrated, comprehensive, and field-oriented. Consequently, I was eager to review this update of one of the field guides that originally had been part of the two-decade–old Geological Society of London Field Guide Series. At first glance, this book looks like it has the potential to be an excellent field reference book. The color photographs are excellent, illustrating a wide variety... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2040.171

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental and Engineering GeoscienceSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207