MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105649448 · doi:10.1109/isspa.2007.4555311

Soft computing-based approach for natural language call routing systems

2007· article· en· W2105649448 on OpenAlexaff
Sameeh Ullah, Fakhri Karray, Arash Abghari, Sushil Kumar Podder

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and dialogue systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLearning vector quantizationNatural languageNatural language understandingArtificial intelligenceLanguage modelSoft computingCache language modelNatural language processingVector quantizationMachine learningUniversal Networking LanguageArtificial neural networkComprehension approach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Call routing based on Natural Language Understanding remains a complex and challenging research area in machine intelligence and language understanding. This is despite the apparent limited success of a few commercial natural language call routing systems. This challenge is due to the limitations imposed by the speech recognition engine, the language model, and the natural language parser. In this paper, we propose a system to enhance the performance of automated call routing applications based on knowledge-based networks. The main focus of this paper is on the enhancement of the performance at the Natural Language Understanding level. We investigate soft computing techniques such as Learning Vector Quantization and the Genetic Algorithm. We find that the Genetic Algorithm outperforms Learning Vector Quantization. We achieve an accuracy rate of 84.12% using the Genetic Algorithm vs. 73% for Learning Vector Quantization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and dialogue systemsFrench-language works237,207