MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105669650 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2008.ecp.26

EVCCM: An Efficient VOIP Congestion Control Mechanism

2008· article· en· W2105669650 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Cao, Hadi Otrok, Benwen Zhu, Noman Mohammed, Prabir Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoice over IPComputer scienceComputer networkService providerNetwork packetQuality of serviceService (business)Computer securityThe InternetWorld Wide WebBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) technology has been widely adopted in communication middleware systems that allow service providers to construct web based applications, such as Web conference systems (WebEx, Gotomeeting), IP based call centers and Web chatting. VOIP is vulnerable to network congestion if too many users access the Web service based VOIP at the same time, especially the services that coordinate with video transmission. VOIP signaling is usually implemented in User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Since UDP cannot verify the packets arrival, the congested network causes IP packets to be lost, delayed or even denial of service and greatly damages the service providers' reputation. We apply mechanism design, an application of game theory, to VOIP middleware management to defend such congested phone calls. Using the proposed model, users play their best options (ex: voice quality and price) to connect to the service. Service providers will provide users' service based on the users' options to maximize service providers' benefits, such as the number of active online users, service fee and system resource usage, to defend the congestion in the network and improve the network performance. In particular, our proposed model is a win-win solution in the way that maximizes both users and service providers' benefits. Finally, empirical results are provided to support our solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207