MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105704179 · doi:10.1109/tap.2010.2048844

Balanced Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna With Dielectric Director for Near-Field Microwave Imaging

2010· article· en· W2105704179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVivaldi antennaAntipodal pointAntenna (radio)DirectivityOpticsAntenna apertureMicrowave imagingMicrowaveDielectricAperture (computer memory)Dipole antennaAntenna measurementPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceTelecommunicationsAcousticsOptoelectronicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna is designed to be used as a sensor for a microwave breast cancer detection system. The antenna has the ability to send short electromagnetic pulses into the near-field, with low distortion, low loss and in a directional manner. The antenna directivity is further improved by the inclusion of a novel feature in the antenna aperture called a “director” which consists of a profiled piece of higher dielectric constant material. Several simulated results are successfully confirmed with measurements. Reflections of a tumor placed in a breast model are simulated for two cases, namely a balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna with and without a director. Greater tumor responses are recorded with the director present, demonstrating the potential of this feature for microwave breast imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it