MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105738432 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1994.592077

Negative DC corona characteristics in SF/sub 6/ under moisture contamination

2002· article· en· W2105738432 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Claude Côté, M.F. Frechétte, R.Y. Larocque

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationCorona dischargePartial dischargeMoistureEnvironmental scienceCorona (planetary geology)Water contentMaterials scienceWater vaporWork (physics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)DesorptionVoltageEnvironmental chemistryElectrodeChemistryComposite materialMeteorologyElectrical engineeringAdsorptionThermodynamicsGeologyPhysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on the effect of moisture contamination related to negative partial-discharge activity in SF/sub 6/. Moisture contamination is common in gas-insulated systems and is mainly due to 1) temperature-dependent water desorption from inner surfaces and 2) external sources of pollution that infiltrate during installation and operation of the apparatus. However, few studies have been published on the subject and even they have focused on positive or AC voltages. Little is known about the influence of water vapor on negative partial-discharge phenomena, or its physical reality. The aim of this work, therefore, is to identify the influence of water contamination on a negative partial-discharge regime from electrical measurements and to corroborate our observations with known data. Any observations of negative effects from water contamination and/or methods of detecting water contamination by means of electrical measurements on gas-insulated systems could be of great help to engineers. The experiment was conducted under true-corona conditions; for that particular arrangement, the breakdown occurred in the range of 25 kV for atmospheric SF/sub 6/. The characterization study focused mainly on the corona current and the distribution of recorded pulse amplitudes and frequencies. The breakdown and inception voltages were also measured. The results of all these measurements, taken separately in pure and contaminated SF/sub 6/ are compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207