The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility toward the Employees and Hotel Industry Performance in Jordan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a positive relationship with businesses performance especially with services companies like Hotels, Hospitals and Universities. The growing concentration to Corporate Social Responsibility is based on its capability to authority company performance. The Corporate Social Responsibility movement is distribution over the world and in the current years a large number of methods and frameworks have been developed, the majority being developed in the West. The present research focuses on the relationship between Corporate Social responsibility and Jordanian Industry Hotels performance. Methodology: A questionnaire was distributed to 100 employees in a hotels of Marriott and Movenpick where operated in Jordan Amman, Aqaba over a month in 2014, with results from Likert scales analyzed using descriptive analysis, means and SDs to tabulate and analyzed. Results: Analysis of 83 suitable responses among the hotels employees found a significant relationship between CSR and hotels performance at the two Hypotheses. Recommendations: Improve employee overall wages packages for employees which is based on productivity rewards. And ensure there is an equally opportunities between the employees in terms of Training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".