MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EFFECTIVENESS OF RECRUITMENT STRATEGIES FOR A PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION IN OLDER ADULTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASES

2003· article· en· W2105757608 on OpenAlexaff
B. Lindström, K E. Chad, Nigel Ashworth, Bobbi Dunphy, Liam Maxwell Harrison, Bruce Reeder, Stephanie A. Schultz, Suzanne Sheppard

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaskatoon City HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)NewspaperPopulationMedicineMass mediaPrint mediaSample (material)GerontologyFamily medicineNursingAdvertisingEnvironmental healthBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engaging sedentary individuals in physical activity (PA) is a challenging endeavor. This poses a problem for PA interventions requiring large sample sizes from a representative population. Effective and feasible recruitment strategies for health-related studies involving PA interventions for community-dwelling older adults (OA) with chronic diseases has not been determined. For research projects to be carried out in reasonable time frames and with appropriate sample populations, information regarding optimum recruitment methods is essential. PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of various recruitment strategies for enrollment into a PA intervention comparing class-based and community-based programs for OA with chronic disease. METHODS Two recruitment strategies were utilized to target healthcare professionals (HP) and the general public (GNP): (1) print media (posters, brochures, newspaper ads); (2) personal contact involving presentations to HP and organizations. Strategies targeting family physicians and other HP involved in-person contacts supplemented with print media. Recruitment of GNP was based on a self-referral system focusing on mass distribution of print media with less emphasis on personal contact. RESULTS Within weeks of initiation, the recruitment strategy generated 153 inquires. The most successful recruitment method was via advertising to GNP, accounting for 61% of the total inquiries. Physician referral yielded 23% of calls, however this reflects only a 10% response rate among physicians. Referrals from other primary HP resulted in 16% of inquiries. CONCLUSION Mass distribution of print material to GNP provided an effective means of generating interest in PA participation, although in-person contact served to enhance this recruitment strategy. Findings suggest various recruitment strategies should be employed, targeting the general population through self-referral. Supported by CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.056
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.103
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0560.103
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207