← Back to cohort
Measurement of inclusive jet charged-particle fragmentation functions in Pb+Pb collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:msqrt><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.76</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext>TeV</mml:mtext></mml:math> with the ATLAS detector
G. Aad, G. Alimonti, D. Su, Y. Makida, Bo Li, Nitesh Soni, B. Galhardo, KK Gan, Andres Jorge Tanasijczuk, A Hasib, Andrew Chegwidden, Lukas Plazak, Guido Negri, Peter Mättig, E. J. W. Moyse, S. Kaneti, S. L. Wu, B. P. Kerševan, X. Ju, M. Corradi, Sascha Caron, Jiri Hejbal, Luis Rodrigues, S. Viel, Angelantonio Castelli, Muhammad Saleem, Michele Bianco, C. Friedrich, Pere Rados, Z. Rurikova, Chad Suhr, Aranzazu Ruiz-Martinez, L. Xu, T. Lari, Peter Kluit, L. Li, D. Ta, Francois Touchard, Zuzana Barnovska, S. Sultansoy, Markus Nordberg, B. Yabsley, C. Willis, Shota Tsiskaridze, Alexander Ruschke, Julia Isabell Hofmann, Yorihito Sugaya, Jorg Wotschack, L. Fabbri, H.-C. Schultz-Coulon, P. Kodyš, William Quayle, E. Banaś, S. Li, Mireia Crispín Ortuzar
Bibliographic record
VenuePhysics Letters B · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of ReginaMcGill UniversityUniversity of VictoriaCarleton UniversityTRIUMFUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Council CanadaServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesGeorgian National Science FoundationEuropean Research CouncilMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCanada Foundation for InnovationMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNarodowe Centrum NaukiLundbeckfondenMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekChinese Academy of SciencesNational Science CouncilEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNational Research FoundationJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyMinerva FoundationComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchArizona-Nevada Academy of ScienceDepartment of Science and Technology, Republic of South AfricaAustrian Science FundH. Lundbeck A/SStichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der MaterieDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueRoyal SocietyNational Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFBrain Research FoundationGerman-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondIsrael Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physicsFragmentation (computing)BinCharged particleCollisionLarge Hadron ColliderImpact parameterPartonParticle physicsHadronAlgorithmIonMathematics
Abstract
OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations159
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes