MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105768841 · doi:10.5381/jot.2004.3.8.a3

Generic Pipelined Multi-Agents Architecture for Multimedia Multimodal Software Environment.

2004· article· en· W2105768841 on OpenAlexafffund
H. Djenidi, Amar Ramdane-Chérif, Chakib Tadj, Nicole Lévy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Object Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and dialogue systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)ArchitectureInterface (matter)Computer architectureAgent architectureReference architectureIntelligent agentDistributed computingSoftware architectureEmbedded systemHuman–computer interactionSoftwareArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimodal human-computer interaction needs intelligent architectures in order to enhance the flexibility and naturelness of the user interface.These architectures have the ability to manage several multithreaded input signals from different input media in order to perform their fusion into intelligent commands.In this paper, a generic comprehensive agent-based architecture for multimodal engine fusion is proposed.The architecture is sketched in term of its relevant components.Each element is modeled using timed colored Petri networks.The generic components of the engine fusion are then included in a pipelined based-agent global architecture for which the architectural quality attributes are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Object TechnologySame topicSpeech and dialogue systemsFrench-language works237,207