MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105774124 · doi:10.3149/jms.1202.133

A Regional Tradition of Gender Equity: Shanghai Men in Sydney, Australia

2004· article· en· W2105774124 on OpenAlex
Weiwei Da

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Men s Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocializationChinaGender equityGender studiesEthnic groupIndustrialisationEquity (law)Gender roleSociologyDivision of labourDemographic economicsPolitical scienceSocial scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawn on data from in-depth interviews with 34 Chinese migrants in Sydney, Australia, this study examines the division of labor in the family, with a focus on men's housework participation and regional differences in terms of migrants' home origin in China. An observed pattern of Shanghai men's housework participation emerged that does not support the theoretical underpinnings of power/resources structure, socialization model, and exchange theory. Shanghai men's housework participation, self-identification as Shanghai men, and self-perceived gender roles suggest there is a regional tradition of gender equity in Shanghai, which has an association with early industrialization, women's participation in the work force, exposure to the Western influences in Shanghai's early history, and social changes and gender reforms in contemporary Chinese society. The findings suggest that men's roles in the family are diverse, ethnic, historic, and regionalized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it