Elafin-overexpressing mice have improved cardiac function after myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elevated serine elastase activity after myocardial infarction can contribute to remodeling associated with left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction. We therefore assessed the effects of overexpressing the selective serine elastase inhibitor elafin in transgenic mice in which a myocardial infarction was caused by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Elevated serine elastase activity was observed in nontransgenic littermates as early as 6 h after LAD ligation and persisted at 4 and 7 days but not in sham-operated or elafin-overexpressing transgenic mice. Myeloperoxidase activity (index of inflammatory cells) and matrix metalloproteinase 2 were also increased but only at 4 and 7 days and only in nontransgenic mice (P < 0.05 for both comparisons), and this increase correlated with inflammatory cell infiltration. Echocardiographic study at 4 days revealed indexes of diastolic dysfunction in nontransgenic versus elafin-overexpressing mice (P < 0.05). Morphometric and biochemical analyses at 28 days indicated impairment in cardiac performance, with greater scar thinning and infarct expansion in nontransgenic versus elafin transgenic littermates (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Thus serine elastase inhibition appears to suppress inflammation, cardiac dilatation, and dysfunction after myocardial infarct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".