MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105804984 · doi:10.1115/imece2009-12794

Determination of Contact Condition at Elevated Temperature

2009· article· en· W2105804984 on OpenAlexaff
Lyne St‐Georges, László I. Kiss, E. de Varennes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisplacement (psychology)MechanicsThermalMaterials scienceThermal contactInverseMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsHeat transferEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To model complex structure with numerous components and solids, the condition of contact between two solids must be adequately described. In this investigation, a special apparatus developed to analyze the condition of contact between two solids is presented. With this apparatus, experimental tests can be performed to determine the condition of friction (static and dynamic and the transition from one to the other) and the thermal and electrical contact resistances between two disk shaped rotating samples of different nature at various temperatures (from ambient up to 1000°C) and contact pressures. To determine the evolution of the friction mechanism as a function of the relative displacement between the solids, an inverse mathematical method has been developed and is presented. The results obtained with the apparatus proposed will provide a better understanding of the contact condition and could be easily incorporated in future mathematical models describing the behaviour of complex, multi layered structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207