MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105821374 · doi:10.1145/1026711.1026761

A web-enabled video indexing system

2004· article· en· W2105821374 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Zhou, Xiao–Ping Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSearch engine indexingHistogramDatabase indexVideo browsingVideo trackingParsingInformation retrievalDetectorArtificial intelligenceVideo processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video parsing and indexing is an important early stage of content-based video analysis. In this paper, we present a new web-enabled video indexing system that integrates Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) standard. New algorithms are proposed for video temporal segmentation. Sharp transition detection is achieved by an enhanced histogram-based method that is robust to illumination changes. For gradual transition detection, new features are introduced for dissolve detection. The proposed dissolve detector is based on a combined analysis of mean-variance-skewness of intensity. Compared with existing variance-based approaches, the introduced new features improve the discrimination ability on shot boundaries. We also describe methods for eliminating false positives. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms can effectively detect shot boundaries. Detected scenes and other cinematic attributes are structured and organized by integrating HTML and SMIL. For each video file, the system generates a table-of-contents indexing file. The user-friendly interface provides web-based interaction, browsing and previewing of video content

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207