MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2105826833 · doi:10.1039/c3sm27770d

Morphologies and phase diagrams of ABC star triblock copolymers confined in a spherical cavity

2013· article· en· W2105826833 on OpenAlex
Shiben Li, Ying Jiang, Jeff Z. Y. Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoft Matter · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase diagramRADIUSMaterials sciencePhase (matter)PolymerSpherical modelCylinderSurface (topology)CopolymerGeometryPhysicsCondensed matter physicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphologies and phase diagrams exhibited by symmetric ABC star triblock copolymer nanoparticles are investigated by using the real-space self-consistent field theory. A variety of three-dimensional morphologies, such as spherically concentric lamellae and ring-like structures, are identified in the triangular phase diagrams for the polymeric nanoparticles, depending on the volume fractions of the components and the interaction between the polymers and the confining spherical surface. We first study a number of examples where the confining radius and degree of interactions between the polymer and the spherical surface are fixed. A neutral surface that has no energetic preference on any ABC component induces ring-like structures in axisymmetry in an orbicular region of the phase diagram, which surrounds the central region where distorted cylinder phases are stable; a spherical surface that attracts one of the three polymer components induces distorted cylinders into the ring-like structures in a central region of the phase diagram; a spherical surface that repels one of the components stabilizes a lamella-like structure in spherical symmetry in a large region of the phase diagrams. We then focus on an example of polygonal tiling morphologies to study the effects due to variations of the spherical radius and the degree of interactions between the polymer and the spherical surface. The results show that the degree of interactions can obviously influence the formation of morphologies but the spherical radius only affects the polygonal tiling morphologies through slightly adjusting their natural arrangement in the neutral surface case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it