Collision-Induced Dissociation of the Ag<sup>+</sup>−Proline Complex: Fragmentation Pathways and Reaction MechanismsA Synergy between Experiment and Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gas-phase collision-induced dissociation of the Ag + -proline complex shows six major product ions. Tandem mass spectrometry reveals that at least three of the fragment ions are formed directly from the complex. These are a cyclic immonium ion, formed after elimination of AgH from the Ag + -proline complex, another cyclic immonium ion formed after the elimination of both AgH and CO 2, and finally an ion formed as the product of a reductive-elimination reaction in which H 2 is lost as a neutral. Selective and nonselective deuterium labeling experiments and hybrid density functional calculations have been employed to probe fragmentation mechanisms that account for all experimental results. The mechanisms for the competitive losses of AgH and H 2 from the Ag + -proline complex have been calculated at B3LYP/DZVP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".